by Graham Lawton and Clare Wilson Why ask people what they think of a product when you can just scan their brains instead? New Scientist explores the brave new world of neuromarketing TAKE A look at the cover of this week's New Scientist magazine (right). Notice anything unusual? Thought not, but behind the scenes your brain is working overtime, focusing your attention on the words and images and cranking up your emotions and memory. How do we know? Because we tested it with a brain scanner. In what we suspect is a world first, this week's cover was created with the help of a technique called neuromarketing, a marriage of market research and neuroscience that uses brain-imaging technology to peek into people's heads and discover what they really want. You may find that sinister. What right does anyone have to try to read your mind? Or perhaps you are sceptical and consider the idea laughable. But neuromarketing, once dismissed as a fad, is becoming part and parcel of modern consumer society. So we decided to take a good look at it - and try it out ourselves. That is how several New Scientist readers ended up in a darkened room in London, wired up to an electroencephalograph (EEG) machine and being shown various magazine cover designs. Our aim - with the help of the European arm of neuromarketing company NeuroFocus, based in Berkeley, California - was to observe their reactions on a level that would not normally be possible. "I've been involved in market research for about 25 years," says Thom Noble, managing director of NeuroFocus Europe. "Every few years a new methodology comes out. Frankly, they're incrementally different. This is transformationally different." © Copyright Reed Business Information Ltd.

Keyword: Brain imaging; Emotions
Link ID: 14336 - Posted: 08.09.2010

By Dan Vergano, USA TODAY If something offers easy answers for not-so-easy questions, you might be reading a popular science book. Malcom Gladwell's Outliers: The Story of Success, centers around the idea of practicing anything for 10,000 hours to be a genius. SuperFreakonomics: Global Cooling, Patriotic Prostitutes, and Why Suicide Bombers Should Buy Life Insurance discovers that economics explains terrorism and climate change. Sex at Dawn suggests evolution explains straying spouses. And then there's Delusions of Gender: How Our Minds, Society and Neurosexism Create Difference by Cordelia Fine. A research associate at the Centre for Agency, Values and Ethics at Australia's Macquarie University, Fine turns the popular science book formula on its head. Chapter-by-chapter, she introduces ideas about the innate differences between the sexes — "it's all fetal hormones" or "men have better-wired brains" or "brain scans show men's brains light up differently" — and then tartly smacks around the studies supposedly supporting them. In particular, Fine joins critics, such as Nikos Logothetis of Germany's Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, to argue that brain images constructed from functional magnetic resonance imaging studies, often on just a few dozen people at most, have become the latest way to slap a scientific-sounding paint job on old ideas about women being intrinsically dumber than men. "The main message of the book is that our comforting beliefs about gender — that everything's fair now, that sex inequality should be blamed on 'hardwired' differences between the sexes, and that our failure to rear unisex children just points the same way — just don't bear up to scrutiny," Fine says, by e-mail. Copyright 2010 USA TODAY,

Keyword: Sexual Behavior; Brain imaging
Link ID: 14335 - Posted: 08.09.2010

Neuroscientists have long used EEGs to try to understand the brain.Neuroscientists have long used EEGs to try to understand the brain. (Str Old/Reuters) Psychiatrists and engineers have teamed up to help predict how people with schizophrenia will respond to a medication that can produce serious side-effects. Psychiatrists say clozapine is an effective treatment for chronic medication-resistant schizophrenia, but it can produce side-effects such as seizures, cardiac arrhythmias or bone marrow suppression and blood problems that require weekly to monthly blood tests to monitor. Now researchers at McMaster University in Hamilton have used machine learning to "train" a computer to predict whether a patient will respond to the drug based on the brainwave patterns and responses recorded on an EEG device readily available at hospitals and laboratories. "Now what we can do is predict beforehand whether the person is going to respond, so we only expose the patient to the risk if there's a very good chance the treatment will be effective," said study author James Reilly, a professor of electrical and computer engineering at McMaster. Reilly and his psychiatrist and engineering colleagues at the university were able to correctly predict whether 23 middle-aged people diagnosed with schizophrenia would respond to the drug with an accuracy of about 89 per cent, according to the study published in the current online issue of the journal Clinical Neurophysiology. © CBC 2010

Keyword: Schizophrenia; Depression
Link ID: 14334 - Posted: 08.07.2010

By Laura Sanders Vivid, violent dreams can portend brain disorders by half a century, a new study finds. The result, reported in the Aug. 10 Neurology, highlights how some neurological diseases may take hold decades before a person is diagnosed. Spotting early warning signs of the disease may allow clinicians to monitor and treat patients long before the brain deteriorates. People with a mysterious sleep disturbance called REM sleep behavior disorder, or RBD, experience a sudden change in the nature of dreams. Dreams increasingly become more violent and frequently involve episodes in which an attacker must be fought off. The normal muscle paralysis that accompanies dreams is gone, leaving the dreamer, who is most often male, to act out the dream’s punches, twists and yells. In many cases, a person sharing the dreamer’s bed can be injured. Doctors used to think of RBD as an isolated disorder. But follow-up studies revealed that a striking number of these patients later develop neurodegenerative diseases, including Parkinson’s disease and Lewy body dementia. The exact figures vary, but some studies find that anywhere from 80 to 100 percent eventually get a neurodegenerative disorder. “The consensus among all RBD researchers is that it’s not a matter of if, but when,” says sleep expert Carlos Schenck of the Minnesota Regional Sleep Disorders Center in Minneapolis, who was one of the first researchers to describe RBD. “Basically, the longer you follow these men, the more they will convert to a neurodegenerative disorder.” © Society for Science & the Public 2000 - 2010

Keyword: Sleep; Parkinsons
Link ID: 14333 - Posted: 08.07.2010

by Tyler Bancroft IN A classic Monty Python moment, a chirpy, long-haired man on a crucifix urges others around him in a similar predicament to cheer up. Now neurologists have discovered what might be described as a "Life of Brian" brain mechanism that encourages us to look on the bright side of life - even when confronted by thoughts of mortality. Shihui Han of Peking University, China, found activity in brain regions that normally deal with negative emotions and self-awareness are dampened when we process ideas about death. Han and colleagues placed 20 volunteers in functional MRI brain scanners while death-related words, such as graveyard, corpse, behead and slay, flashed up on a screen. Neutral and negative words were also displayed. Unsurprisingly, words related to death activated brain areas already known to process unpleasant or threatening notions. More interestingly, they were associated with comparatively lower activity in the insula and the mid-cingulate (Neuropsychologia, DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.07.026). The insula is associated with sense of self and awareness of sensations and movement. Further tests showed that the more participants associated specific words with death, the lower the activity in the insula. Damage to this region is associated with reduced emotional awareness and expression, sometimes resulting in socially inappropriate behaviour. © Copyright Reed Business Information Ltd.

Keyword: Emotions
Link ID: 14332 - Posted: 08.07.2010

By Emily Anthes One of the first things that anatomy students learn is that the brain is divided down the center. In most people, one half, or hemisphere, plays a dominant role. Handedness has long been a crude measure of hemispheric dominance, because each side of the brain controls the opposite side of the body. Right-handers, for instance, are likely to have dominant left hemispheres. Today researchers are realizing that studying ambidextrous children (who have no dominant hand) could yield insights into the consequences of an unusually symmetrical brain. A team of European researchers recently assessed nearly 8,000 Finnish children and showed that mixed-handed children are at increased risk for linguistic, scholastic and attention-related difficulties. At age eight, mixed-handed kids were about twice as likely to have language and academic difficulties as their peers. By the time the children were 16, they also were twice as likely to have symptoms of ADHD—and their symptoms were more severe than those of right- or left-handed students. Ambidexterity is not causing these problems. Rather “handedness is really a very crude measure of how the brain is working,” says Alina Rodriguez, a clinical psychologist at King’s College London and the study’s lead author. In typical brains, language is rooted in the left hemisphere, and net­works that control attention are anchored in the right—but brains without a dominant hemisphere may be working and communicating differently. © 2010 Scientific American,

Keyword: ADHD; Laterality
Link ID: 14331 - Posted: 08.07.2010

By Katherine Harmon More than 26 percent of American adults were obese as of 2009—compared with less than 20 percent in 2000, according to a new report from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. And the number of U.S. states with more than 30 percent of their population topping a body mass index (BMI) of 30 tripled between 2007 and 2009. With this accelerating epidemic, researchers are looking for clues beyond daily diet and exercise to explain our propensity for extra poundage—and many are finding evidence in the very first stages of life. A growing number of analyses have found a convincing link among a heavier mother-to-be, increases in her baby's birth weight, and the child's later risk of obesity. In many past observational studies, however, basic genetics or environmental factors could be blamed for this association. A new study of 513,501 mothers and 1,164,750 of their children born across 15 years aimed to take genetics out of the equation by assessing maternal and infant weight only for those women who had more than one child. "By making comparisons of two or more infants born to the same mother, we were able to factor out the role of genetics," says David Ludwig, an associate professor of pediatrics, director of the Obesity Program at Children's Hospital Boston and co-author of the new study. Women who gained more than 24 kilograms during a pregnancy (which occurred in about 12 percent of pregnancies) added an average of 147.4 additional grams to their baby's birth weight than those who gained about 7.5 to 10 kilograms. © 2010 Scientific American,

Keyword: Obesity; Development of the Brain
Link ID: 14330 - Posted: 08.07.2010

By NICHOLAS WADE Two research reports published Friday offer novel approaches to the age-old dream of regenerating the body from its own cells. Animals like newts and zebra fish can regenerate limbs, fins, even part of the heart. If only people could do the same, amputees might grow new limbs and stricken hearts be coaxed to repair themselves. But humans have very little regenerative capacity, probably because of an evolutionary trade-off: suppressing cell growth reduced the risk of cancer, enabling humans to live longer. A person can renew his liver to some extent, and regrow a fingertip while very young, but not much more. In the first of the two new approaches, a research group at Stanford University led by Helen M. Blau, Jason H. Pomerantz and Kostandin V. Pajcini has taken a possible first step toward unlocking the human ability to regenerate. By inactivating two genes that work to suppress tumors, they got mouse muscle cells to revert to a younger state, start dividing and help repair tissue. What is true of mice is often true of humans, and although scientists are a long way from being able to cause limbs to regenerate, the research is attracting attention. Jeremy Brockes, a leading expert on regeneration at University College London, said the report was “an excellent paper.” Though there is a lot still to learn about the process, “it is hard to imagine that it will not be informative for regenerative medicine in the future,” he said. Copyright 2010 The New York Times Company

Keyword: Regeneration; Stem Cells
Link ID: 14329 - Posted: 08.07.2010

By DENISE GRADY Americans are continuing to get fatter and fatter, with obesity rates reaching 30 percent or more in nine states last year, as opposed to only three states in 2007, health officials reported on Tuesday. The increases mean that 2.4 million more people became obese from 2007 to 2009, bringing the total to 72.5 million, or 26.7 percent of the population. The numbers are part of a continuing and ominous trend. But the rates are probably underestimates because they are based on a phone survey in which 400,000 participants were asked their weight and height instead of having it measured by someone else, and people have a notorious tendency to describe themselves as taller and lighter than they really are. “Over the past several decades, obesity has increased faster than anyone could have imagined it would,” said Dr. Thomas Frieden, the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which issued a report on the prevalence of obesity. Obesity rates have doubled in adults and tripled in children in recent decades, Dr. Frieden said. If the numbers keep going up, he added, “more people will get sick and die from the complications of obesity, such as heart disease, stroke, diabetes and cancer.” The report estimates the medical costs of obesity to be as high as $147 billion a year, and notes that “past efforts and investments to prevent and control obesity have not been adequate.” Copyright 2010 The New York Times Company

Keyword: Obesity
Link ID: 14328 - Posted: 08.05.2010

By GINA KOLATA Will Alzheimer’s disease, a terrible degenerative brain disease with no treatments and no clear guidelines for diagnosis before its end stages, become like heart disease? That might mean early markers of risk, analogous to high cholesterol levels, that predict who is likely to get it. And it might mean drugs that actually prevent it. That is the hope behind new diagnostic guidelines being proposed by the National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer’s Association. In July, when the groups first announced their proposed guidelines, they were met with some skepticism and anger. Why suggest ways of diagnosing the disease before a person even has symptoms? Why tell people they are doomed? And are those early diagnosis guidelines just a sop to pharmaceutical companies so they can start marketing expensive, and perhaps not very effective, new drugs? So the Alzheimer’s Association, with participation from the National Institute on Aging, held a conference call on Wednesday to clarify their position. They wanted, in particular, to explain why they advocated using so-called biomarkers, like scans for amyloid plaque in the brain, a unique feature of Alzheimer’s, and tests of cerebrospinal fluid. Such brain scans are still experimental. Copyright 2010 The New York Times Company

Keyword: Alzheimers; Brain imaging
Link ID: 14327 - Posted: 08.05.2010

Q. I had migraine diagnosed when I was 24 years old (I’m now 30), but I remember having them since my teens. I usually get them during times when my hormone levels change (e.g., during periods, ovulation). There are also other triggers like stress, too little sleep, etc. If the migraines start during the day, they are often preceded and/or followed by major mood swings, the kind that make me want to go jump off the bridge. The associated depression often recedes with pain and then comes back again after the pain recedes. Afterward, I can feel on top of the world — loving, caring and full of joy. Is this normal? Espoo, Finland A. Dr. Dodick responds: What you are experiencing before and after the headache of a migraine attack is not unusual. I am glad you asked, because it speaks to why I emphasize that migraine is more than just a bad headache. Migraine is too often “bookmarked” by the start and stop of the headache, but migraine is frequently associated with symptoms other than headache before, during and after the onset of head pain. About 75 percent of migraine sufferers will experience non-headache premonitory symptoms prior to the headache pain. Patients experience a range of cognitive, emotional and physical symptoms in this phase; the most common include feeling tired and weary, difficulty concentrating, stiff neck, dizziness, light and noise sensitivity, yawning, and depression or irritability. Copyright 2010 The New York Times Company

Keyword: Pain & Touch; Emotions
Link ID: 14326 - Posted: 08.05.2010

by Alison Motluk OVERSIZED brains are to humans what trunks are to elephants and elaborate tail feathers are to peacocks - our defining glory. What would we be without our superlative, gargantuan, neuron-packed brains? Like Donald Trump without his towers, Simon Cowell without his sneering put-downs or Bridget Jones without her diaries. We would just be ordinary primates. Unquestionably smart ones, of course, just not special. Uncomfortable as it is to contemplate, it is looking increasingly likely that our brains are not something to write home about after all. One group of researchers has scrutinised the primate archaeological record and concluded that the human brain has evolved just as would be expected for a primate of our size. Meanwhile, a biologist who has compared the number of neurons in the brains of all sorts of animals says there is nothing special about the human brain compared with other primates. No one is doubting the fact of human intelligence, but they say it can no longer be attributed to a "supersized" brain. Humans, apparently, are no more than ordinary primates with ordinary-sized brains. These findings undermine a fundamental and long-standing belief about our place in the kingdom of life: that Homo sapiens is the greatest species ever to grace the Earth and that we have become the greatest because our brains are the best ever to have evolved. Admittedly, justifying this assertion has taxed our self-professed ingenuity. Clearly ours is not the biggest brain on the planet in absolute terms - whales and elephants outdo us by up to six times - but we counter this by arguing that bigger animals are bound to have bigger brains. And if you take body size into account our brain is exceptionally large, as much as seven times larger than those of other mammals (Science, vol 121, p 447). The underlying assumption is still that when it comes to intelligence, brain size matters. But does it? © Copyright Reed Business Information Ltd.

Keyword: Evolution
Link ID: 14325 - Posted: 08.05.2010

By Lesley Richardson, Press Association A framework to understand the emotional lives of animals was revealed today. Animal choices can be assessed objectively as evidence of pessimistic or optimistic decision-making which indicates their long-term mood. Professor Mike Mendl and Dr Liz Paul, from the University of Bristol, and Dr Oliver Burman, from the University of Lincoln, looked through papers by experts from Charles Darwin to Paul Ekman and Jaak Panksepp to create the framework which can be used in the field of animal welfare and neuroscience. Professor Mike Mendl, head of the Animal Welfare and Behaviour research group at Bristol University's School of Clinical Veterinary Science, said: "Because we can measure animal choices objectively, we can use optimistic and pessimistic decision-making as an indicator of the animal's emotional state which itself is much more difficult to assess. "Recent studies by our group and others suggest that this may be a valuable new approach in a variety of animal species. Public interest in animal welfare remains high, with widespread implications for the way in which animals are treated, used and included in society. We believe our approach could help us to better understand and assess an animal's emotion." ©independent.co.uk

Keyword: Emotions; Evolution
Link ID: 14324 - Posted: 08.05.2010

NEW YORK — Want to maximize the placebo effect? A good way to do this, according to a new study, is to tell someone they have a decent chance of getting the real treatment instead of a fake pill, but keep them guessing. In the study, Parkinson's disease patients given a placebo after being told they had a 75 percent chance of receiving an active drug produced significant amounts of dopamine, a chemical key to the brain's reward system that is scarce in the brains of patients with this disease. But no dopamine response occurred in patients given placebo after being told they had a 25 percent, 50 percent, or 100 percent chance of getting real treatment. The findings show that expectations directly regulate the power of the placebo effect by kicking the brain's reward system into gear, probably not just in Parkinson's patients but in a number of different illnesses, such as chronic pain and depression, according to Dr. A. Jon Stoessl of the Pacific Parkinson's Research Center in Vancouver, British Columbia, and his colleagues. "The greatest form of reward is really to get better, so expectation of improvement is akin to expectation of reward," Stoessl explained in an interview. Stoessl and his colleagues first demonstrated a relationship between the placebo effect and dopamine release in Parkinson's patients nine years ago. Given dopamine's role in the reward system, he explained, "perhaps it would be important for the placebo effect in other conditions." SOURCE: http://link.reuters.com/cab43n Archives of General Psychiatry, August 2010. Copyright 2010 Reuters.

Keyword: Pain & Touch; Parkinsons
Link ID: 14323 - Posted: 08.05.2010

By Katherine Harmon Having a mixed up body clock has been linked to a vast array of ailments, including obesity and bipolar disorder. And researchers are still trying to understand just how these cyclical signals influence aspects of our cellular and organ system activity. Now, a study published online August 3 in Cell Metabolism shows that in mice, a disrupted circadian rhythm spurs an increase in triglycerides—heightened levels of which have been linked to heart disease and metabolic syndrome in humans. To find this link, researchers compared normal lab mice to those bred to have dysfunctional sleep-wake cycles. As nocturnal animals, the control mice had the lowest levels of triglycerides at night, when they were most active, and higher levels during the daytime rest period. The mice with out-of-whack cycles kept confused hours, fed longer and were less active overall. These mutant mice also had far less fluctuation in their triglyceride levels. "We show that the normal up and down [of triglycerides] is lost in clock mutants," M. Mahmood Hussain, of the Department of Cell Biology and Pediatrics at the State University of New York Downstate Medical Center in Brooklyn and coauthor of the paper, said in a prepared statement. The mutant mice had "high triglycerides all the time," he noted. © 2010 Scientific American,

Keyword: Biological Rhythms; Obesity
Link ID: 14322 - Posted: 08.05.2010

By Janet Raloff Cash register and other receipts may expose consumers to substantial amounts of bisphenol A, a hormone-mimicking chemical that has been linked with a host of potential health risks, according to a trio of recent studies. Each study offers preliminary evidence that a large number of retail outlets print sales receipts on certain types of heat-sensitive, or thermal, paper that use BPA as a color developer. Two of the new studies also showed that the BPA coating easily rubs off onto fingers. And one found evidence that BPA from receipts may penetrate skin. The pollutant, which mimics the biological activity of estrogen, has been tied to health risks from behavioral problems in children to obesity and heart ailments. In animals, exposures in the womb put moms and their offspring at risk for later metabolic diseases. Based on growing concern about possible risks from ubiquitous exposure to BPA, especially in children, the federal government recently issued warnings to parents about where their families were most likely to encounter the chemicals. Store receipts did not make the list, although there have been hints for years that thermal receipt paper could be a rich source. Chemist John Warner learned about the chemistry of thermal- and pressure-sensitive papers while working for Polaroid years ago. Manufacturers lay a powdery coating containing BPA, a dye and a solvent onto one side of a piece of paper. When heat or pressure is applied, the coating’s constituents merge to release the ink’s color, he explains. © Society for Science & the Public 2000 - 2010

Keyword: Hormones & Behavior; Development of the Brain
Link ID: 14321 - Posted: 08.05.2010

By Dana Scarton Following a protocol demonstrated moments earlier, the Colorado youth pressed his bare hands against the rim of a urinal, licked each palm, then reached out to accept a Tic Tac. Before popping the mint into his mouth, Christian added a move of his own: He dropped it onto the tile floor and stomped on it. The ad lib elicited gasps, congratulatory pats on the back, and applause from onlookers crammed into the men's room on a lower level of the Hyatt Regency Crystal City. As the others took their turn at the bizarre ritual, Christian leaned on a wall outside, seeming pleased if perhaps a bit queasy. "I wanted to challenge myself," he said. Christian later told his father, Kern Low, that he would no longer struggle with paralyzing fears of contamination associated with public restrooms, a problem that had interfered with family outings for the past three years. Facing fears was the evening's objective for Christian and about 150 other people dealing with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Led by psychologist Jonathan Grayson, they were going "Virtual Camping" -- a two-hour after-dark excursion and germfest that was part of the 2010 International OCD Foundation Conference held at the Hyatt Regency last month. "What can you do in one night?" Grayson had asked as the evening began. "You can take a step toward learning how to deal with uncertainty." Then he led the participants into the steamy streets of Crystal City, where, among other things, they would be encouraged to shake the hand of a homeless man (to fight more contamination fears), to chant "Crash and burn" to passing motorists (to show that thoughts would not cause actual harm) and to touch ripe garbage with their bare hands (contamination, again). © 1996-2010 The Washington Post Company

Keyword: OCD - Obsessive Compulsive Disorder
Link ID: 14320 - Posted: 08.03.2010

By CLAUDIA DREIFUS About four years ago, John Donoghue’s son, Jacob, then 18, took his father aside and declared, “Dad, I now understand what you do — you’re ‘The Matrix’!” Dr. Donoghue, 61, is a professor of engineering and neuroscience at Brown University, studying how human brain signals could combine with modern electronics to help paralyzed people gain greater control over their environments. He’s designed a machine, the BrainGate, that uses thought to move objects. We spoke for two hours in his Brown University offices in Providence, R.I., and then again by telephone. An edited version of the two conversations follows: Q. WHAT EXACTLY IS BRAINGATE? A. It’s a way for people who’ve been paralyzed by strokes, spinal cord injuries or A.L.S. to connect their brains to the outside world. The system uses a tiny sensor that’s been implanted into the part of a person’s brain that generates movement commands. This sensor picks up brain signals, transmits them to a plug attached to the person’s scalp. The signals then go to a computer which is programmed to translate them into simple actions. Q. WHY MOVE THE SIGNALS OUT OF THE BODY? A. Because for many paralyzed people, there’s been a break between their brain and the rest of their nervous system. Their brains may be fully functional, but their thoughts don’t go anywhere. What BrainGate does is bypass the broken connection. Free of the body, the signal is directed to machines that will turn thoughts into action. Copyright 2010 The New York Times Company

Keyword: Robotics; Movement Disorders
Link ID: 14319 - Posted: 08.03.2010

By Jesse Bering Last week, while in a drowsy, altitude-induced delirium 35,000 feet somewhere over Iceland, I groped mindlessly for the cozy blue blanket poking out beneath my seat, only to realize—to my unutterable horror—that I was in fact tugging soundly on a wriggling, sock-covered big toe. Now with a temperament such as mine, life tends to be one awkward conversation after the next, so when I turned around, smiling, to apologize to the owner of this toe, my gaze was met by a very large man whose grunt suggested that he was having some difficulty in finding the humor in this incident. Unpleasant, yes. But I now call this event serendipitous. As I rested my head back against that sanitation paper-covered airline pillow, my mid-flight mind lighted away to a much happier memory, one involving another big toe, yet this one belonging to a noticeably more good-humored animal than the one sitting behind me. This other toe—which felt every bit as much as its overstuffed human equivalent did, I should add—was attached to a 450-pound Western Lowland gorilla, with calcified gums, named King. When I was 19, and he was 27, I spent much of the Summer of 1996 with my toothless friend King, listening to Frank Sinatra and the Three Tenors (my bizarre foray into science, which you can read about here), playing chase from one side of his exhibit to the other, and tickling his toes. He’d lean back in his night house, stick out one huge ashen grey foot through the bars of his cage and leave it dangling there in anticipation, erupting in shoulder-heaving guttural “laughter” as I’d grab hold of one of his toes and gently give it a palpable squeeze. He almost couldn’t control himself when, one day, I leaned down to act as though I was going to bite on that plump digit. If you’ve never seen a gorilla in a fit of laughter, I’d recommend searching out such a sight before you pass from this world. It’s something that would stir up cognitive dissonance in even the heartiest of creationists. © 2010 Scientific American

Keyword: Emotions; Evolution
Link ID: 14318 - Posted: 08.03.2010

By Katherine Harmon The tangled web of autism symptoms and genetic markers has left researchers searching for patterns and trends in unusual places. New work examining the subtle symptoms shared by close relatives has underscored the disease's heritability. Findings published online August 2 in Archives of General Psychiatry add to the growing list of familial clues about the disease: shared eye-movement deficits. Researchers working at the University of Illinois at Chicago's (U.I.C.) Center for Cognitive Medicine have found a striking trend: those with autistic relatives are more likely to show disrupted eye movement similar to their afflicted relation. Large-scale genetic studies have turned up nuanced and conflicting results about the genetic basis of autism and its myriad symptoms. Other research has discovered that many people with an autistic relative or child might themselves have some subtle behavior variant as well, such as obsessive-compulsive tendencies or communication problems. Eye movement is easier to study neurologically than complex social and behavioral patterns—in large part because "we know a lot about what parts of the brain are involved," says Matthew Mosconi, an assistant professor of psychiatry at the U.I.C. and lead author of the new study. And the new findings examine basic deficits unclouded by social tendencies, such as the aversion many people with autism spectrum disorder have to looking at faces. © 2010 Scientific American

Keyword: Autism; Vision
Link ID: 14317 - Posted: 08.03.2010